Seesmic du Jour 147: Successful copy catsIn Menorca I had many conversations with people who make web pages that copy existing sites. Is this a model that can actually be successful? Here is what they had to say, what do you think?
Californian wine or French one? The new episode of the Great Village answers this question... Kind of...
Here is how I start my day, how do you start yours?When I wake up, I generally take a coffee (and as often as possible I go running) and here is what I do generally before anything else, it takes me about an hour:
-check my tweets, @replies and direct messages on Twhirl
-check techmeme, read key blogs
-check incoming seesmic videos and the conversations there
-check new comments on my blog
-check Seesmic on google blog search
-read and collect on del.icio.us all the feedback there (today about our Disqus launch of video comments)
-leave a few comments on blogs, left a video comment on TechCrunch
-read my Friendfeed and the conversation on my items
-add new friends on Facebook, I don't check inbox there because 99% is crap and marketing generally but the rest is fun
-write a post: today Seesmic and journalism
-share or post a few videos on Loic.tv and Seesmic
-post some of these videos on my blog, Facebook and Twitter
-chat with a friend on Facebook (339 friends online there now, scary?)
-check getsatisfaction feedback about Seesmic
-finally check emails, a pain
-and last but not least, sort my tasks on rememberthemilk which I love, really
Ooops did not find time again to check my google reader...
Now the same in video and the conversation in Seesmic:
Why journalists should use Seesmic according to a journalistPaul Bradshaw, also known as onlinejournalist on Seesmic and paulbradshaw on Twitter, experiments and comments Seesmic for journalism. See this video conversation about journalism and Seesmic Paul started.
Paul did not see the point of Seesmic at first (like many) and explain now why he finds it very interesting for the future of journalism. I must confess I did not think too much about the potential use as Seesmic for journalism, but thanks Paul for giving me ideas to think about. I really liked Paul's video below and bullet pointed some of the topics below. Thanks, Paul, please keep suggestions coming our way we will improve Seesmic so that it is useful for journalists. I like the idea.
Why journalists should come on Seesmic according to Paul:
-it will become pervasive like Twitter even if it will take time
-journalists ability to communicate in video is increasingly important for them
-if you treat video as a broadcast medium like TV you are making a mistake
-using Seesmic will get you used to conversations in video
-you learn the language of online video in Seesmic
-not for news gathering yet but it will come
-not for ideas gathering for stories but soon
-very useful for distribution
-best place to learn your video language
Paul also asked me a few questions for my first interview via Seesmic, so more is coming on that topic soon.
Seesmic du Jour 146: Conference call vs. dinnerI had the pleasure of spending a morning in Menorca with Joi Ito, John Markoff and Thomas Crampton. We talked about the future of old media in a new media world. I also had the opportunity to speak at TechTalk about the cultural differences that I have noticed as an entrepeneur in moving from Europe to the US.
My reasons why video comments will work (and why you have to try and give them a chance)We are thrilled that after the success of our Video comments plugin for Wordpress that got installed on nearly 300 blogs, disqus enabled video comments using Seesmic this morning. I see lots of people wondering if they will work or not. I think it is way too early to get to any conclusion, it is a very new way of communicating and it will take time.
We are not used to talk to a webcam alone and if you remember when we started blogging, everybody thought it was kind of weird. Well talking to a webcam is much more weird. The way I do it every day is I imagine the people I am talking to. For example my videos on http://loic.tv get an average of 3000 views a day and are approaching one million views in total. I try to imagine talking to all these people, like if you are in a conference addressing the audience. What is difficult is that you don't "feel" them as when you speak in public. Still, they are here. Depending on the community of the blog where you leave the video comment, you may not reach that many people, but is it the number of people that really matter or who you are talking to?
1. get to know your community better
Video gives you a much better sense of who is talking: you get to see her or him, hear, see, view gestures and get feelings. Somebody said recently "on Seesmic you know if people are honest", I loved it. They are very authentic.
Video comments allow publishers to connect with their reader in a much better way
2. less spam
unless you put a bag on your head, video comments are not anonymous. It is like in real life. You could say you don't like me in my back or you could tell me directly in front of me. A video comment is much more direct, and straight. It will reduce spam as people have to show their faces. (Yes, they can show something else than their faces too, but you get the point)
3. it gives some accountability to people
It is really easy to leave an anonymous comment in text, insult people, criticize etc. On a video comment, you have to be yourself and take responsibility for what you say. I like that.
4. they are great promotion for you
There aren't that many video comments around for the time being, that is true, and it is an opportunity to get noticed. Leaving a video comment on a TechCrunch post for example catches the readers' attention amongst 100 text comments.
5. they are not heavy and do not slow down your blogs
I have read in some places (including Fred Wilson this morning) that video comments enabled on your blogs would slow them down and make them heavy. Pay attention to the fact that the Seesmic player is only launched when you click on the thumbnail. The thumbnails of the comments are light and load fast, they do not slow down your blogs.
6. why not?
Why kill them before even giving them a chance? It's new, it's not in our common way of using the web and our computers, let's see if it sticks. Why would we have so many conversations in text on the web and not in video?
We have newspapers, books, radio and TV. They are not replacing one another, they are different. Why not video conversations?
7. conversations are huge on TV
See the success of talk shows on TV. They are everywhere and I enjoy watching them from now and then. I was invited regularly on two TV talk shows in France, "en aparte" et "n'ayons pas peur des mots" on Canal+ and i>tele. I really enjoyed it but was also very frustrated that we were only few people debating to an audience that could not react. Video conversations let anybody react and talk if they like.
8. Seeing my friends is cool
I like seeing friends. I like seeing people I do not know yet and you get to know them much better than in text. I feel I know some people on Seesmic much better than people I just read and have not met yet.
9. it is almost like meeting them
Someone on Seesmic recently was saying that he or she could not remember if she had met or not somebody he or she is used to see in video. Video gets very close to meeting someone, it is as close as we can get to meeting in person.
11. the geek world may not reflect what will happen in other communities
we tend to think too much with our geek world in mind. Think about a political blog. Think about dating. There are many conversations where video will make tons of sense, I think.
12. video is a much better way to show you things than describe them, see Robert Scoble's example below.
13. it is conduit for more emotional response compared to just leaving a text comment
Can't wait to see them enabled on some political blogs. Text brings more emotions and debate will get very intense when people have passionate debates.
14. They tear down that barrier that the internet is just a cold, spaceless place
Meeting people on the internet through video is much warmer than reading text. I have never felt that close to some people in my community than since I "met them" in video.
objections and how we try hard (or will try) to address them
1. they take time to watch
This is true. Much more than a text comment. We are thinking about how to solve this and an obvious answer is metadata. This one could be generated by software/voice recognition+human help like spinvox does.
We are also thinking about adding a visual sign if they are less than one or a few minutes so that you know before having to watch it.
2. they are not accessible to the deaf
True, subtitles is probably the way to go and unsure how we can subtitle all the comments, maybe enable wiki-style subtitling like dotsub does, but do not forget deaf can use video too
3. people generally talk for too long
That can be a problem but also a great advantage if you are interested into what person says. In this case you really want to learn more. Metadata is the answer.
4. with text all the power is in the reader, while with video, the power is in the author
I like this one, but I kind of disagree as you can always stop the video and go to the next one.
5. they are not searchable
That is true and metadata, again, is the solution.
6. they disrupt the conversation
Should they be integrated in text comments or kept separate like what we did in any Seesmic video conversation thread? We don't know, this is why we enable both and we will see what people prefer. I like both text and video integrated, we do this in Friendfeed too, people can leave text comments on any seesmic video on Friendfeed.
You can now get video comments on any blog platform with DisqusDisqus now supports Seesmic video comments.
Here are the first blogs that have enabled them (including this blog!):
Dave Winer
LouisGray.com
SheGeeks.net
Fred Wilson
HowardLindzon.com
WinExtra.com
Disqus is compatible with most blog platforms. Blogs discussing this: Fred Wilson, CenterNetworks, The Bivings Report, WinExtra, The Blog Herald, The Social Times, Scripting News, Scobleizer, The Boy Genius Report, louisgray.com, and more.
Seesmic du Jour 145: I'm obese and 54 years oldWhat can we learn about ourselves from the Wii fit? I play the Wii fit with Martin Varsavsky and an audience of entrepreneurs in Menorca to find out. Based on my own results, ahem, it's clearly not very accurate.
Seesmic du Jour 144: What happened in Menorca?I've just returned from Menorca, Spain, where Martin Varsavsky hosted 'Tech Talk 2008.' I met great people, had amazing conversations and played with the Wii fit as well as as some other neat gadgets. This week will be a recap of that great week so here is a sneak peak of what is to come...
